Anger Management
What a week in Democracy! The yin,
the yang! (We're kind of a Little China, aren't we?) Oh! The dizzying highs, terrible lows, and creamy middles, as Homer J.
Simpson might say: Down with women! NO! Up with women! Down with blacks, other minorities, and the
poor! Immigrants, maybe you can stay! Or not! Up with gays! And by "up,"I don't mean erect! Get federally married! But not in Alabama! The head swims!
So, how to FEEL, exactly?
Fortunately, there are no absolutes when it comes to anything, especially
feeling, but simmering underneath the celebrations and disappointments, nestled
in Miss O’s love-brimming heart, is an anger that remains ever-present, ever
nursed. One might call Miss O’ a grudge-holder. I prefer to think of this habit
of anger-keeping as smart defense. Yet the question remains: Is it ever useful to hold onto anger?
I would say, "Fuck YES. It is."
Many years ago, when Miss O’ was in
her late twenties, she was in the exquisite care of a LCSW (Licensed Clinical
Social Worker) whom I’ll call Selma Moritz. (I
checked past blogs to see if I’d written the piece, “How I Found My Therapist,”
but apparently I haven’t written about this.) Selma gave me my life back after
what can only be called a breakdown. (Pardon your narrator if she does not
divulge the cause(s) of the breakdown, won’t you? I know you will.)
When I first entered the office of
Selma, sight unseen (she was given to me by referral from friends), I only knew
she had shared her practice with a partner, in another office in the same suite. I looked at the two doors, wondering nervously which office I'd be stepping into, when one of the two doors opened, and a client
(the term they use now, rather than patient) emerged, followed by a woman dressed in an ensemble straight out of a Talbot’s catalog: This being 1992, she had held to a preppy look: medium-length skirt,
hose, and heels, topped by a cashmere crewneck sweater over an Oxford pinpoint
blouse and silk neckerchief, all in soft, neutral colors. Her hair was short, ash blonde, perfectly coiffed.
I froze, and then in a panic, I began to get up to leave, because there was no way
in HELL I could tell my problems to anyone this gorgeously put together. The
woman, mistaking my rising for greeting, put out her hand. “Hi, I’m Jan Kent,”
she said. I took her hand and sat back down, explaining I was here to see
Selma Mortiz. And then the other door
opened, and a client exited. And through this door emerged the woman who would be my
therapist.
At the office doorway that afternoon stood a short woman whose head sprouted a mass of dark roots pushing out
bleached tresses in the style of late Einstein. Her face had no makeup. Her
small form was sheathed by an ill-fitting colorless blouse tucked, sort of, into a plaid mini skirt, her bare legs
partially covered in white go-go boots. She was so beautiful, I almost wept. “Hi, I’m Selma Moritz," she said, raising her bushy eyebrows into a smile that her mouth was more cautious about. "Are you Lisa?” I knew I could tell her anything.
And thus began the four years
of weekly visits (with summers off for Miss O' to attend graduate school), including an overlap of one year of group therapy in addition, and Selma Moritz helped Miss O’ see through the fog, emerge from depression and
anxiety, discover the origins of her survival difficulties, and compensate for
her myriad blindspots—all through conscious behavioral modification, most of
which have worked to this day (occasional depressive episodes notwithstanding), and KUDOS.
But there was one point of
disagreement, a point which emerged in group therapy, when a man I’ll call Ken
(one of a dozen others in the group) declined to “let go” of his “anger.” In every other
way, on any other issue, Ken and I had not one overlap: He was rich, corporate, right
wing, anti-public education; I was middle class, in public service, a lefty, and a public
school teacher. (When he denigrated public schools in one session, I felt
compelled to point out that I went to VA public schools when little old ladies
born on farms in 1910 were some of my teachers, and I went on to study at
Oxford as part of my master’s. He dismissed me as an exception, so I began to
mention my many friends who had attended Harvard, Princeton, MIT, Johns
Hopkins, and other fine schools, but he wasn’t interested in being, you know, wrong.)
So back at Group: Selma, who shared
the facilitating with Jan, as well as Ken’s therapist, Ed, was perplexed by Ken's statement,
but I realized I could relate. “If I have my anger,” I explained, “and someone
is hurting people I love, I can defend them to the death.” Ken agreed that
anger was a potential protection, and while no one wants what I had—a
hair-trigger temper, an anger so violent when it did manifest itself that it
terrified anyone who was around it, let alone the target of it—I also didn’t
want to be “anger-free.” I believe in righteous anger. Boundaries are
boundaries, and anger tells you when a line has been crossed.
I share all this because this week
was one hell of a fucking mixed up week in the realm of American politics.
Boundaries have been crossed, my friends, and while I celebrate some victories,
I hold my anger near my heart, in case.
Chasing Rainbows
First off, let’s salute future
governor of Texas (if women-supporting fans of America and righteous citizens
of Texas are any barometer), state senator Wendy Davis. Her 11-hour (or 12-hour, or 13-hour), citizen-supported
filibuster of a rightwing bill contrived to close abortion clinics for things
like having parking lots that are too small, for example, prevented the bill
from reaching the floor for a vote. To effect this outcome, she had to stand and talk ON TOPIC for
all of those 11 hours, no breaks, no peeing, no rest, and she fucking did it.
Texas Lt. Governor Dewhurst gave her three strikes—one of the “strikes” was
talking about their closing of Planned Parenthood clinics that provided
abortions as being “off-topic”—but that brilliant woman kept at it until the
bill expired one second after midnight, and won. She is a hero of democracy.
Change in any society, as we see
daily, even hourly—on television, via Internet, or (less often, sad to say) in
person—is part physical revolution, part legal process, ALL democratic
participation. It’s messy, long, and
generally always blocked for as long as possible by the (white, wealthy, or
wealth-identified, male, or “cheerfully” male-oppressed) people who can say,
loudly and defiantly, “I got mine.” (Curiously, Gov. Rick Perry tried to
discredit Wendy Davis by calling out her choice to have her child when she
became pregnant as a teenager, because if Wendy Davis chose to have her child
(discounting Davis's stance that all women should get to choose what is right for them),
then Rick Perry should get to decide that all women should be made to carry
their pregnancies to term. Because that’s so logical.)
Shared on the "Binders Full of Women" page on Facebook |
Not to throw douchebag water over
this week’s good times, especially on the day of National Gay Pride Parades in
America, but Miss O’ feels compelled to point out these little tidbits:
So this week in America, we saw the
Supreme Court of the United States take its citizens back to Jim Crow and also ahead
to Gay Pride, but in both rulings there is one common denominator: White men
(Clarence Thomas does not identify “black,” whatever his gene pool or his
family’s personal history) decided that voters and homosexuals can be freely
oppressed according to the laws of their individual states. Not only can state
legislatures prevent minorities, the working classes, and the poor from
reasonably casting votes, they can also choose not to recognize a marriage that
is sanctioned by the United States government. (You know how when you move from
New York to Alabama, and your heterosexual marriage doesn’t count anymore? It’s
like that. Oh, wait.)
“States’ Rights,” as we all know,
amount to little more than protecting the “rights” of the bigoted, ignorant,
and fearful so that they may enslave, oppress, or otherwise prevent the comfort
of the poor, minorities, immigrants, and women. That’s pretty much it. On
paper, states’ rights sounds like a “checks and balances” safeguard, but in my
lifetime I have yet to see the “balances” part, unless it's that progressive states pave the way down Shame Alley that oppressive states will eventually have to move through. So, okay, sometimes states' rights rock.
The images of revolution around the
world—images of the revolt by oppressed people in countries around the world, including
ours—against corporate-controlled, oppressive, totalitarian regimes (I speak of
our Republican House, here) are unprecedented. (Note: You may have noticed that Miss O' has not commented on the NSA/Snowden Reveal. She has decidedly mixed feelings about the whole business, not that you have been holding out hope of her opinion. It's sordid, isn't it? No one will get out of that mess looking remotely shiny; so we wait.) I see all the images coming out of Egypt, out of Turkey, ...and the silence I experience: It makes me wonder if Congress ever
turns on a television. Oh, wait. Corporate sponsors prevent the television
stations from broadcasting much of that stuff. Funny how we learn about it anyway. And status update or tweeted twat, this freedom of speech, one by one and also en masse, is what gives me hope.
So I’m thinking of what it means to
Storm the Bastille, to set up and advance through barricades. I’ve been reading
(for months, as for bible study) a fascinating history, The Greater Journey: Americans in Paris by David McCullough. In Chapter
9, “Under Seige,” McCullough shares descriptions of Paris under siege by the
Germans in 1870, through the eyes of an American minister who was living there
at the time. It’s an apt description of almost any war situation.
There are no carriages passing on the grand
avenue, that great artery through which has passed for so many years all the
royalty, the wealth, the fashion, the frivolity, the vice of Paris… and here is the silence of death.
“Has the world ever witnessed such a change
in so short a time,” he wondered. “It to me seems like a dream.”
—American
minister Elihu Washburn, 1870
Paris had become an armed camp. There were
soldiers everywhere—encamped all about the Arc de Triomphe and down the
Champs-Elysees—more than 300,000, he had been told, ….
The day before, Sunday, the Germans had cut
all roads into the city…. The Germans were at the gates and nearly 2 million
people, civilians and soldiers, were now trapped.
“And it seems odd to be in this world, and
still not in it,” Washburn wrote.
This is how gays feel every day.
This is how aware women can be made
to feel at most any workplace in this nation. This is how blacks feel in the
South. This is how legal immigrants feel, how refugees feel, how the poor feel,
most anytime they turn on the television. In a media world abounding in
displays of too-perfect beauty, its vitriolic rhetoric is what passes for news analysis; and too often in the 5-4 decisions of a rightwing Supreme Court, it
must seem odd to be in this country, and still not in it.
Via Facebook. Thanks, Jesus H. |
It's Not Easy Being Green
Promotion only, and no copyright infringement, is intended. Seriously, Miss O' lives for this magazine's weekly arrival. |
When she saw this splendid New Yorker cover posted on Facebook, Miss O' wept. I also realized that it’s a cover that would work whatever the outcome of
the Supreme Court vote, so kudos to editor David Remnick and cover artist Jack
Hunter. When I awoke on Saturday morning, I discovered via the internets that
loads of Americans were very UNHAPPY about this cover. Gosh! Miss O’ was once
again gob-smacked at the capacity of rightwing Americans to see SEX,
FORNICATION, FELLATIO, and BUTTFUCKING in a sweet gesture of affection and
support. (And Jesus wept?)
So here is what I posted on
Facebook:
On The New Yorker Cover: Years and years and years ago, when I was born--this would have
been 1964--my dad, Bernie, asked his old Air Force buddy, Bob Kent, who
happened to be bartending in Arlington, VA, where my parents were living, to be
my godfather. Bob lived with his roommate, Pete Madeo, and I remember adoring
these two men. Around the time I was five, my parents figured out that Uncle
Bob and Uncle Pete were more than roommates, that Uncle Bob was, in fact, my
"fairy" godfather; and they just sort of stopped speaking to them.
About 35 years and an activist daughter later, ol' Mom and Dad realized this
was stupid, and wrote them a letter. Bob and Pete were in the phonebook, still
together, too--just like my mom and dad. "Bert and Ernie," as
everyone knows, are Sesame Street characters, they are buddies that kids can
relate to. The cover illustration is neither "sexualizing" Bert and
Ernie, nor is this moment representing Sesame Street: The cover is a tribute of
love to all the men and women out there who had to "pass" themselves
off as "roommates" or "brothers" or "sisters" in
order to share living space, to share their lives. The New Yorker is a magazine
for grownups, and all of us have a history with Sesame Street. Most of us were
instantly touched. My feeling, for what Miss O's feelings are worth, is to
enjoy the love.
Another American icon, George Takei, a national treasure
of a celebrity if ever there was one, was interviewed by The Huffington Post about gay rights, about how his life and times have been
shaped by social media, and what it has meant for his career post-Star Trek:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/29/george-takei-star-trek-gay_n_3512332.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/29/george-takei-star-trek-gay_n_3512332.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices
As with Sesame Street, the role of Star Trek cannot be
overestimated in the shaping of our culture, too, in Miss O’s humble opinion.
As Mr. Takei notes:
Some of
the cast and creatives were aware that I was gay, and I did, on occasion, bring
a male date to parties. “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry was aware of my
sexual orientation and very supportive. That was the extraordinary thing about
“Star Trek.” That we were a diverse crew of people representing so many colors,
backgrounds and heritages. That was the promise of the future. And, now, in the
J.J. Abrams reboot, an openly gay actor is playing a Vulcan in love with an
African American. I'm not really surprised by this. “Star Trek” taught us to
look ahead to a time where Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream was fulfilled.
Being a part of that vision was -- and has remained -- a tremendous honor.
George Takei is excited by how much America has learned from a cool television show.
Meanwhile, the Texas attorney general thinks that the student who led the protests against the abortion bill should be thrown in jail. Ain't that America? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/06/30/1220053/-Tea-Party-Texas-AG-threatens-student-who-supported-Wendy# I mean, what are we teaching our young people if we tell them they are free? if we allow them to have role models that show them how to use their voices to effect change? if we let them watch fucking Star Trek and learn from it?
Because you knew somewhere Miss O' would have to get to education.
Common Ground: Where Is Our Common Core?
Next week, or sometime after the summer, Miss O’
will spend a good long time talking about the Common Core State Standards
(CCSS), which is the subject of controversy in school districts
all over the country. It seems to Miss O’ that between this country’s
astounding ignorance about the Common Core, as well as its unforgivable ignorance of
Constitutionally guaranteed rights and citizenship responsibilities, it would
be awesome if our national media could be commandeered for one little day to
help us all. I think two things in particular are desperately needed:
1. All
the national and cable networks need to do one evening of education on the
Common Core State Standards for Reading Comprehension, Language, and Writing—an
hour special, with only one commercial interruption to let educational guru Dr.
Tim Shanahan, or example, explain how they work. (Ha, ha! I know.)
2. All
the national and cable networks need to allow one hour, two or three times a
year, to educate all Americans on CIVICS. Have a charming person, such as
Stephen Colbert, beloved by Yankees and Crackers alike, to teach civics to all
of us, making it mandatory viewing for all elected officials in this country.
In each little boardroom and hall of power, provide a really solid history
professor to stand by for Q & A.
Too many fucking
mud dumb idiots are getting elected at the pleasure of corporations via their money, and as a
result don’t know for example, that 1) Americans do not spend their entire
lives in one state, and therefore having their years of study confined to one
state’s version of what is educationally useful can be pretty fucking
debilitating; and 2) Americans have many nationally guaranteed rights, such as
the right to peaceably assemble, which includes chanting, and that showing up
at a hall of power—which is maintained at the pleasure of the CITIZENS, and not
the elected, by the way (remember “We, the People”?)—is not, as Texas State Lt.
Governor Dewhurst believes, terrorism.
He and his compatriot Sen. Bill Zedler actually think this.
During
the filibuster, hundreds of pro-choice supporters gathered in and around the
Texas State Senate and gave jeers to Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst when he struck
Davis’s discussion of ultrasound testing as off-topic. Dewhurst also gave Davis
an off-topic strike when she requested a back-brace to curb discomfort from
standing for a near 11 hours. After the vote was taken and the bill died,
Dewhurst called the protesters “an unruly mob using Occupy Wall Street
tactics.”
As if that wasn’t bad
enough, around 11 o’clock on the night of the filibuster, Texas state Sen. Bill
Zedler (R) posted on his Twitter that “We had terrorist
in the Texas State Senate opposing SB 5.” Apparently, to Zedler, invoking the
first amendment right to assemble is an act of terrorism. If the protesters
were pro-life, these “terrorists” would, assuredly, automatically turn into
“patriots” for him. Not only are Republicans sore about the loss, they are
ever-persistent.
Here’s more of the story: http://www.ringoffireradio.com/2013/06/27/texas-abortion-bills-death-stirs-republicans/
Here’s more of the story: http://www.ringoffireradio.com/2013/06/27/texas-abortion-bills-death-stirs-republicans/
Dewhurst also wanted to have the media arrested for covering the story, and then decided against it. (I suspect the First Amendment and a capable attorney made the decision for him.)
Read more: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/06/29/1219953/-Tx-Lt-Gov-decides-against-arresting-media
As writer Joshua deLeon points out:
If politicians like Wendy Davis, and their supporters, remain steadfast in their track for pro-choice legislation, it could prove to be another loss to Republicans who throw around the word “terrorist” and try to demean people for exercising their right to assemble.
—Joshua de Leon is a writer and researcher
with Ring of Fire.
And finally, in all the mire, the mess, the devastations and elations, I give thanks as ever to Stephen Colbert. Here is a sampling of his wisdom, in this post on Facebook today:
The Colbert Report
The Colbert Report
"In DOMA and
the Voting Rights Act cases, it was about states' rights, not the people in
those states. That's why the first words in the Constitution are, 'We the
states.' I think, it's really hard to read those gay letters." -- Stephen
Colbert http://on.cc.com/1cqz2oI
And so on this Pride March Day, the
43rd since 1970’s first one, in honor of the Stonewall Riots of
1969: Peace and love to all; and especially to those who fight for their rights
and endure the mantle of “activist,” when really all you are doing is claiming
your own, Miss O’ salutes and hugs you.
Pride Flag from The Community Center in Idaho, via Google Images |
Yours as ever,
Miss O’